Jill Stien

Rank 26 of 47
|
Score 17

The statement criticizes the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) as benefiting the fossil fuel industry and accuses liberals of ignorance. It engages in public discourse by addressing a policy issue and its implications.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language ('con job', 'willful ignorance') which may not promote understanding or empathy. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement accuses a group ('Libs') of ignorance, which could be seen as disrespectful and not conducive to constructive dialogue. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does so in a way that could be perceived as a personal attack on a group rather than focusing on policy critique. [-1]