Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Derenic Byrd
@DerenicByrd
·
159d
The statement criticizes current government leaders for their handling of homelessness and endorses an alternative political figure. It engages in public discourse by addressing a societal issue and political accountability.
- The statement expresses frustration with current leaders, which could be seen as harmful if it incites anger without constructive solutions. However, it does highlight a significant issue. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in hate speech but could be seen as dismissive of certain political figures, potentially lacking respect. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement criticizes current leaders but does not engage in personal attacks. It promotes an alternative candidate, which is a form of political dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.