Jill Stien

Rank 26 of 47
|
Score 17

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing political issues and the implications of voting choices in the context of U.S. elections. It critiques the binary political system and suggests an alternative, while also making strong accusations about supporters of certain candidates.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses charged language that could be considered harmful, as it accuses people of supporting genocide based on their political choices, which is a serious and inflammatory claim. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of others by implying that those who support certain candidates are complicit in genocide, which could be seen as a form of hate speech. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses divisive language and does not foster constructive dialogue. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes personal attacks and uses ad hominem arguments against those with differing political views. [-2]