Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing political figures, electoral strategies, and accusations of genocide, which are significant public issues. The tone is accusatory and confrontational, with a focus on criticizing political figures and media personalities.
- The statement uses strong language, such as 'genocidal candidates,' which could be considered harmful and inflammatory, violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement accuses individuals and groups of serious actions without providing evidence, which could be seen as disrespectful and potentially defamatory, violating the principle of respecting privacy and dignity. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement challenges Mehdi Hasan to a debate, which aligns with engaging in dialogue, but it also includes personal attacks, such as questioning his courage, which violates the principle of avoiding ad hominem arguments. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that could be considered irresponsible due to the use of inflammatory language and personal attacks. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.