Joseph Zeballos-Roig
@josephzeballos
·
75d
The statement is a strong defense of Lina Khan's position as FTC chair, emphasizing her role in supporting working people and criticizing the idea of her removal. It uses combative language to express opposition to billionaires' influence and the potential decision to remove Khan.
- The statement uses aggressive language, which could be seen as harmful or inciting conflict, thus violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the aggressive tone could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses combative language rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead using a confrontational approach. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement attempts to use influence to support a societal issue, namely the protection of a public official who is perceived to fight for working people. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but could be seen as using the platform irresponsibly due to its aggressive tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.