Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement engages with public discourse by addressing political issues related to Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation, and political figures. It suggests a critique of political endorsements and policies, indicating a substantive engagement with public issues.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the tone is somewhat sarcastic and dismissive, which could be seen as undermining constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does mention public figures and organizations in a critical manner.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on critique and sarcasm. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does not foster constructive criticism or dialogue either.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- There is no indication of acknowledging or correcting mistakes in the statement.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses influence to critique political entities, which could be seen as an attempt to inform or persuade the public, but it lacks a clear constructive purpose.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but could use the platform more responsibly by fostering a more constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.