Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement 'How can you vote for this?' in response to a tweet about a tragic event in Gaza constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant public issue, namely the conflict in Gaza and the actions of the Israeli military. The tone is accusatory and challenges the reader to consider their stance or actions regarding the situation.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as emotionally charged, potentially inciting strong reactions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it is important to consider the sensitivity of the topic.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more accusatory and confrontational. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is a rhetorical question that could be seen as a personal attack on those who support the actions being criticized. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to challenge others to reconsider their stance, which could be seen as an attempt to better society by questioning support for violence. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but could be more responsible by fostering dialogue rather than confrontation.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.