Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is a critique of Kamala Harris's response during an interview, suggesting that her answers are vague or lacking substance, akin to a book report written without reading the book. This critique is part of a public discussion about the clarity and substance of political communication, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as dismissive or mocking, which may not fully align with striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in criticism of Harris's communication style but does so in a way that could be perceived as a personal attack rather than constructive criticism. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.