Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is a strong admonition against voting for policies or candidates perceived to support actions described as genocidal, specifically in the context of US involvement in the Israel-Palestine conflict. It uses vivid imagery ('scarlet letter') to emphasize the moral and ethical weight of such a decision.
- The statement aims to prevent harm by discouraging support for actions it describes as genocidal, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it uses strong language that could be seen as accusatory.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks a tone of empathy or compassion, focusing instead on a warning. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or criticism, as it presents a stark warning without room for discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate against perceived injustice, aligning with societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech to address a significant public issue, but the tone could be more responsible and balanced.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.