Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement questions the language used by Democrats and legacy news media when discussing climate change, suggesting it is intentionally crafted to appeal to a certain audience. The tone is critical and implies manipulation in the choice of language, which could be seen as engaging in public discourse about how climate change is communicated.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies manipulation, which could be seen as undermining trust. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does generalize about political groups and media.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is critical and somewhat accusatory. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents an accusatory perspective without inviting discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity by implying manipulation without evidence. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.