The statement appears to be a commentary on political strategy, suggesting that Democrats are shifting focus from Kamala Harris to Jill Stein in response to polling against Trump. It implies a critique of political tactics, which can be considered public discourse as it engages with political dynamics and electoral strategies.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a negative view of political strategy, which could be seen as critical but not harmful.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does mention public figures in a political context.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement is critical of political strategy but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It could be seen as a form of political critique. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.