Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement discusses electoral predictions and criticizes a political candidate, which constitutes public discourse. It presents a partisan perspective and includes a critique of a candidate's policy positions.
- The statement uses strong language ('vapid candidate') which could be seen as harmful or disrespectful, slightly violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in hate speech or harassment, but the language could be seen as disrespectful, slightly violating the principle of respecting dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and uses a personal attack, violating the principle of engaging in constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.