Reposted by Dr. Jill Steinš»
The statement appears to be a critique of President Biden's policies or actions concerning Palestinians, suggesting a significant negative impact. It is part of a public conversation on social media, likely intended to provoke discussion or highlight perceived injustices.
- The statement implies harm by attributing a large number of deaths to Biden's policies, but it lacks context or evidence, potentially misleading the audience.Ā [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it could be seen as inflammatory without providing context.Ā [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it lacks nuance and context.Ā [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes a bold claim without supporting evidence or inviting discussion.Ā [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to criticize a public figure but does so in a way that may not contribute positively to societal discourse.Ā [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or uphold integrity due to lack of context and evidence.Ā [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.