Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Patrick Svitek
@PatrickSvitek
·
444d
The statement critiques a political figure's seemingly contradictory positions, highlighting a tension between labeling Republicans as a threat and proposing to work with them. It engages with public discourse by addressing political strategy and bipartisanship.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it could contribute to political polarization.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on highlighting contradictions rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to critique political strategies. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.