Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement by Dr. Tanya Haj-Hassan addresses a serious public issue by labeling a situation as genocide and implicating media agencies in this context. It is a substantive engagement with public discourse as it involves a critical analysis of a societal issue and calls for accountability.
- The statement aims to highlight a grave issue, potentially preventing harm by raising awareness, thus aligning with the principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, maintaining respect for privacy and dignity. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By calling attention to a serious issue, the statement seeks to promote understanding and empathy, aligning with this principle. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather criticizes media agencies' roles, which can be seen as constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to bring attention to a significant societal issue, aligning with the principle of betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech responsibly by addressing a critical issue, aligning with this principle. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.