Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement critiques Barack Obama's comments regarding the support of Kamala Harris, suggesting that his remarks are condescending and overlook the importance of evaluating candidates based on their record and policy rather than identity alone. The tone is critical and challenges the assumption that identity should be the primary factor in political support.
- The statement does not use harmful language but expresses a critical opinion, which is a part of healthy public discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It critiques a public figure's opinion without attacking personal characteristics.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement could promote understanding by encouraging a deeper evaluation of political candidates beyond identity, though it does not explicitly promote empathy or compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of Barack Obama's comments, focusing on the content of his message rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech responsibly by addressing a public issue and contributing to civic dialogue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.