Jill Stien

Rank 37 of 47
|
Score -66

The statement accuses a public figure, Kamala Harris, of supporting genocide, which is a serious allegation. It also includes a self-proclamation of decency by the speaker and endorses the message, linking to an unspecified website. The tone is accusatory and potentially defamatory, lacking evidence or context.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement potentially causes harm by making a serious accusation without evidence, violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement could be considered a form of harassment or hate speech against Kamala Harris, violating the principle of respecting the dignity of others. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue and instead makes a personal attack, violating the principle of avoiding ad hominem arguments. [-2]