Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement by Dr. Tanya Haj-Hassan, as referenced in the tweet, constitutes public discourse as it addresses a serious public issue, namely genocide, and critiques media agencies' roles in such events. The tone is urgent and accusatory, aiming to raise awareness and provoke a response from both the public and media entities.
- The statement aims to raise awareness about a serious issue, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm by potentially preventing further harm through awareness. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make a strong accusation against media agencies.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement seeks to promote understanding of the gravity of the situation, though its accusatory tone may limit empathy and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue but rather makes a strong accusation, which could be seen as a form of personal attack against media agencies. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight a significant societal issue, aiming for the betterment of society by calling for accountability. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech to address a critical issue, using the platform to challenge media narratives. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.