Jill Stien

Rank 37 of 47
|
Score -66

The statement critiques the validity of polling data and its impact on a candidate's perceived viability. It suggests that polls may not accurately represent public opinion, as evidenced by the limited options in the poll shown. The conversation touches on public discourse by questioning the influence of polls on political narratives.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others but challenges the credibility of polling methods.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by highlighting potential biases in polling, encouraging critical thinking about data representation. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of polling practices without personal attacks. [+1]