Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is a politically charged critique of President Biden, accusing him of committing genocides in Gaza and Lebanon, and it also distances the speaker from supporting Trump. The tone is accusatory and aims to influence public opinion on political leadership and foreign policy.
- The statement uses strong language that could be considered harmful, as it accuses a political leader of committing genocide without providing evidence, which could incite anger or fear. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the use of the term 'genocide' is a serious accusation that could be seen as disrespectful if not substantiated. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is primarily accusatory and does not offer a constructive path forward. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes serious accusations without engaging in a reasoned argument or discussion. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to sway public opinion against political figures, but it does so in a divisive manner rather than for societal betterment. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible or uphold integrity, given the serious nature of the accusations without evidence. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.