Jill Stien

Rank 37 of 47
|
Score -66

The statement expresses a strong opinion on U.S. military actions, suggesting they could lead to regional conflict. It uses charged language, such as 'psychos,' which could be seen as inflammatory.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses inflammatory language, potentially causing harm by escalating tensions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The use of derogatory language towards public figures does not respect their dignity. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead using accusatory language. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, opting for personal attacks instead. [-2]