Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing a serious and contentious issue related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, specifically focusing on the bombing of displaced people's tents and the perceived hypocrisy of a public figure's stance.
- The statement uses graphic imagery and accusatory language, which could be seen as harmful, reducing its adherence to the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it does question the integrity of a public figure, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticizing a public figure rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in personal attacks by questioning the genuineness of a public figure's condemnation, violating the principle of constructive criticism. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or constructive, as it focuses on personal attacks rather than substantive dialogue. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.