Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement expresses a strong opinion on the perceived disparity in international reactions to actions by Iran and Israel, suggesting a bias in favor of Israel. It uses emotive language to highlight the perceived undervaluing of Palestinian lives by Western politicians.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm by escalating tensions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the dignity of those involved, as it makes broad generalizations about Western politicians' values. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it frames the issue in a divisive manner. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it uses accusatory language rather than fostering discussion. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.