Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is a reaction to a reported event involving violence against children in a conflict zone. It expresses strong emotions and political criticism directed at specific political figures, namely Biden and Kamala, in response to the situation.
- The statement uses strong language that could be considered harmful or inflammatory, violating the principle of doing no harm with words. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the use of profanity could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on expressing anger and blame. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for a personal attack on political figures. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to draw attention to a serious issue, but does so in a manner that may not contribute positively to societal discourse. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that lacks responsibility and integrity due to its inflammatory nature. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.