Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement constitutes public discourse as it involves a political figure, Dr. Jill Stein, expressing her stance on a public policy issue, Colorado's Proposition 131, during a campaign rally. This contributes to civic dialogue by engaging with a public issue.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it is a political stance on a policy issue.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By expressing a clear stance on Proposition 131, the statement can promote understanding and dialogue about the issue, though it does not explicitly promote empathy or compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing instead on a policy issue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- Dr. Jill Stein uses her influence to address a public policy issue, which can be seen as an effort to contribute to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly using a public platform to discuss a policy issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.