Reposted by Ayanna Pressley
The Washington Post
@washingtonpost
·
10d
The statement is a passionate response to a reported airstrike on a hospital in Gaza, calling for a ceasefire and criticizing U.S. military support. It engages with a significant public issue, namely the conflict in Gaza, and calls for action, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement aims to highlight the harm caused by military actions and calls for a ceasefire, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, and respects the dignity of those affected by the conflict. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By calling for a ceasefire and questioning the humanity of the situation, the statement promotes empathy and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather criticizes policies and actions, aligning with constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for societal betterment by calling for peace and a halt to violence. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech responsibly by addressing a public issue with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.