Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Revolutionary Blackout Network🥋
@SocialistMMA
·
400d
The statement critiques Kamala Harris's agenda for Black men by comparing it unfavorably to Jill Stein's, suggesting that Stein's approach is more serious. The tone is dismissive and critical, aiming to highlight perceived inadequacies in Harris's policy proposals.
- The statement uses strong language ('trash') which could be seen as harmful or disrespectful, potentially violating the principle of striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the dismissive tone may not fully respect the dignity of the individuals involved. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it uses derogatory language rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.