Reposted by Dr. Jill Steinš»
The statement references a political endorsement and criticizes current political figures, suggesting it engages in public discourse by addressing political issues and public concerns.
- The statement uses strong language, such as 'genocide,' which could be considered harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm.Ā [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the use of charged language could be seen as disrespectful.Ā [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticism without offering constructive dialogue.Ā [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement criticizes political figures but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on policy issues.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to critique political actions, which could be seen as an attempt to influence public opinion, but the approach may not be for the betterment of society due to its divisive tone.Ā [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but may not use the platform responsibly due to its potentially inflammatory language.Ā [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.