Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement critiques a political action, suggesting it is a strategic move related to elections, and calls for immediate action on a weapons embargo. It engages with public issues concerning international relations and humanitarian concerns.
- The statement does not directly harm but implies criticism of political motives, which could be seen as undermining trust. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The call for a weapons embargo suggests a desire to address humanitarian issues, promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement lacks constructive dialogue and could be seen as dismissive of the political process, potentially leading to polarization. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.