The statement addresses a public issue by discussing the endorsement of a campaign by a controversial figure, David Duke, and criticizes the actions of others in the public sphere. It uses strong language to distance the campaign from the endorsement and makes a comparison to Kamala Harris.
- The statement uses strong language that could be considered harmful, particularly in its reference to Kamala Harris, which may not align with striving to do no harm.Ā [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement could be seen as engaging in a form of harassment or hate speech by making a negative comparison to Kamala Harris, potentially disrespecting her dignity.Ā [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue and instead makes a personal attack on Kamala Harris, which is an ad hominem argument.Ā [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to address a public issue but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or uphold integrity due to its accusatory tone.Ā [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.