Reposted by Vivek Ramaswamy
The statement critiques the economic policies associated with Kamala Harris, referred to as 'Kamalanomics,' and suggests that these policies have negatively impacted Americans. It encourages voting for Trump regardless of personal economic circumstances, implying a strong partisan stance. The statement is part of a broader conversation about comparing the records of two administrations, which is a substantive engagement with public issues.
- The statement does not directly harm with words, but it uses a partisan tone that could polarize rather than unify, which is a minor concern.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it presents a one-sided view and does not invite discussion or address counterarguments, which is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to promote a political agenda rather than the betterment of society as a whole, which is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a partisan manner, which is responsible but lacks balance, a minor concern.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.