Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
400d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of political endorsements from controversial figures and questioning the responses of public figures to such endorsements. It raises concerns about the association with white supremacist figures and challenges political accountability.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies harm by associating Kamala Harris with a negative figure, which could be seen as harmful rhetoric. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct hate speech or harassment but uses a provocative comparison that could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead uses a provocative comparison that could be seen as a personal attack. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to question political figures, but the integrity of the argument is questionable due to the provocative nature of the comparison.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.