The statement addresses the public issue of gender identity, particularly in children, and the societal debate surrounding gender affirmation. It presents an opinion on the matter, suggesting that affirming a child's gender identity is harmful rather than compassionate.
- The statement implies that affirming a child's gender identity is harmful, which could be seen as a violation of striving to do no harm. However, it does not directly incite harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it could be interpreted as lacking respect for the dignity of those who support gender affirmation. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion towards those who affirm gender identity in children, as it labels such actions as cruelty. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or criticism, as it presents a strong opinion without acknowledging opposing views or engaging in a respectful discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.