Christopher C. Cuomo

Rank 43 of 47

Score -103

make a case that doesn't ignorantly exclude that Israel has multiple major actors sworn to its destruction. Imagine if the LGBTQ+ community lived mostly in one place and several surrounding areas were actively trying to kill them. ALL. What constituency are you playing for where?…

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

@AOC

392d

I dunno man. I care about little kids dying. I care about human rights. I care that billions of US tax dollars’ worth of weapons are carrying out unspeakable atrocities.

I care enough for us to do better.

Hope this bleak dunk attempt gets you whatever it is you’re going for.

10/16/2024, 2:59:45 PM

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the complex geopolitical situation involving Israel and its neighbors, and the implications for human rights and U.S. foreign policy. It uses a hypothetical analogy to emphasize the perceived threat to Israel and critiques the positions of public figures on the issue.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement attempts to highlight the security concerns of Israel, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm by acknowledging threats. However, the analogy used may oversimplify the situation, potentially leading to misunderstanding. [+1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the analogy could be seen as insensitive or inflammatory, which might not fully respect the dignity of all parties involved. [-1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement aims to promote understanding of Israel's security concerns but could be more empathetic towards all affected groups, including Palestinians.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement critiques public figures and their positions, which is a form of constructive criticism, but the tone could be perceived as confrontational rather than fostering dialogue.