Matt Taibbi

Rank 30 of 47
|
Score -3

The statement raises questions about the University of California's commitment to First Amendment principles, suggesting a critical examination of its practices. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with issues of free speech and institutional accountability.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm; it seeks to investigate and inform. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by questioning institutional practices related to free speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement invites dialogue and critique without personal attacks. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    It uses the platform to potentially enhance societal understanding of free speech issues. [+1]