Jill Stien

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -80

The statement suggests a public discourse by calling for a discussion on policy platforms, which is a substantive engagement with public issues. However, it uses derogatory language and personal attacks, which detract from constructive dialogue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses harmful language, referring to political parties with derogatory terms, which violates the principle of doing no harm with words. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The use of derogatory language and potential hate speech against political entities violates the principle of respecting the dignity of others. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement fails to engage in constructive criticism and instead uses personal attacks, violating this principle. [-2]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    While the statement attempts to engage in public discourse, the use of derogatory language undermines the responsible use of free speech. [-1]