The statement promotes a conversation about the origins of human civilization, specifically discussing a controversial hypothesis by Graham Hancock. It invites public engagement on a topic of historical and scientific interest, which can be considered public discourse as it addresses broader questions about human history and civilization.
- The statement promotes understanding and curiosity about human history by discussing a controversial hypothesis, which can foster empathy and compassion for diverse perspectives on historical narratives. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It presents the hypothesis as controversial, which invites constructive dialogue and criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to responsibly share a discussion on a topic of public interest, upholding the principles of free speech and integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.