Peter Diamandis

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 139
10/16/2024, 9:11:05 PM
X
In reply to:
David Mitchell
@lagunastarman
·
19d
@PeterDiamandis Actually, it does certainly state your accomplishments and caring Peter

But this is also a warning where feedback loops are necessary

I'm sure you've read the book "Hooked", an essential read and had my two eldest daughters read it

AI dangerously can become a "Yes Man"
Peter H. Diamandis, MD
@PeterDiamandis
·
19d
Just asked ChatGPT what it perceives about me based upon my questions over the past year... Proud of what it generated...

"From our conversations, it's clear that you have a deep passion for understanding and extending human potential—whether through longevity science,…

The statement is part of a conversation about the potential risks of AI becoming overly agreeable or sycophantic, which touches on public concerns about AI behavior and ethics. The tone is informal and somewhat critical, suggesting skepticism about AI's ability to provide honest feedback.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a need for caution in AI interactions, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by highlighting the risk of AI becoming a 'Yes Man,' which is relevant to the ongoing dialogue about AI ethics. [+1]