Matt Taibbi

Rank 30 of 47
|
Score -3

The statement questions the clarity and specifics of Kamala Harris's policy differences from Joe Biden, referencing her interview responses. It engages in public discourse by addressing political leadership and policy distinctions, which are relevant public issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but questions the clarity of political statements, which is a neutral action.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy but seeks clarification, which is a neutral stance.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the clarity of Harris's policy differences, adhering to this principle. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by questioning a public figure's statements responsibly. [+1]