The statement addresses the influence of money on politics and science, suggesting a corruption of integrity in these fields. It references a conversation about financial ties between peer reviewers and drug/device companies, implying a conflict of interest in scientific research.
- The statement does not directly harm others but implies systemic harm through financial influence, aligning with the principle by highlighting a potential issue. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on systemic issues rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by bringing attention to potential conflicts of interest in science, fostering awareness and critical thinking. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather critiques a systemic issue, aligning with constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By highlighting a potential issue in science, the statement uses influence to potentially better society by encouraging scrutiny and reform. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly discussing a public concern with integrity. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.