Jill Stien

Rank 38 of 47
|
Score -80

The statement and accompanying image engage in public discourse by addressing political strategies and election dynamics. It critiques the Democratic National Committee's actions against Jill Stein, suggesting these are unfounded and politically motivated. The use of the hashtag #GazaGenocide introduces a separate, serious issue, potentially to draw attention to broader political concerns.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to challenge political narratives, which can be seen as promoting accountability, but the use of 'smears and myths' could be perceived as inflammatory.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy but uses strong language that could be seen as confrontational. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement attempts to promote understanding of political dynamics but may not foster empathy due to its critical tone. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of the DNC, which is constructive in nature but could be perceived as a personal attack on the party's actions.