Matt Taibbi

The statement engages in a discussion about public trust in mass media, which is a public issue. It questions whether responses to a Gallup poll about trust in mass media include platforms like Substack, suggesting a critique of how media is perceived and categorized.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a question that seeks clarification rather than making harmful assertions.
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does encourage consideration of how media platforms are perceived, which can lead to a broader understanding of media trust issues.
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in a form of dialogue by questioning an assumption, which can be seen as constructive criticism. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
4. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principle of free speech by questioning and engaging in dialogue about media trust, using the platform responsibly to discuss a public issue. [+1]