The statement critiques the government's role in determining misinformation, suggesting a bias against criticism. It raises concerns about freedom of speech and government overreach, which are public issues.
- The statement does not directly harm with words or actions, but it implies potential harm by the government, which is a critique rather than a harmful act.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on critique. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does not offer constructive criticism or dialogue either.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by questioning government actions, using the platform to raise awareness about potential overreach. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.