In reply to:
Megan Norris
@Detroitmpnorris
·
4d
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
4d
The statement engages in a discussion about media coverage of former President Trump's cognitive abilities, challenging the notion of a 'total lack' of such coverage. It is part of a broader conversation about media bias and public trust.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could contribute to polarization by focusing on media bias.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but engages in a public critique of media coverage, which can be sensitive.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is more focused on challenging a claim. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism by questioning the accuracy of a claim about media coverage. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.