Jill Stien

The statement is part of a conversation addressing serious societal issues, specifically racism and international conflict, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is urgent and calls for collective action against perceived injustices.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement calls for an end to crimes, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm, but the context of the conversation could potentially incite strong emotions. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the context could be seen as inflammatory.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement attempts to promote understanding by linking different liberation movements, but it could be more explicit in fostering empathy and compassion. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in personal attacks, but it lacks constructive dialogue with opposing views.
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses influence to call for societal change, aligning with the principle of betterment of society. [+1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement exercises free speech to address public issues, but the responsibility and integrity of the platform are not fully clear. [+1]