Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement expresses concern about foreign involvement in U.S. elections, comparing it to hypothetical scenarios involving other countries. It uses a critical tone to highlight perceived double standards.
- The statement raises concerns about potential harm to the electoral process, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but could be seen as accusatory, potentially bordering on disrespectful discourse. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism of political actions, but it could be more constructive and less speculative. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.