Republicans against Trump
@RpsAgainstTrump
·
3d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing a public issue related to intelligence, political figures, and potential foreign influence. It questions the credibility of intelligence sources and the implications of such claims on public figures, specifically Donald Trump. The tone is skeptical and challenges the validity of past and current intelligence claims.
- The statement does not directly harm with words but implies skepticism about intelligence sources, which could indirectly affect public trust.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it questions the credibility of intelligence sources and public figures.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on skepticism and critique. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of intelligence sources and public figures but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech by questioning public issues and uses the platform to raise concerns about intelligence credibility. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.