Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Matt Smith
@mattsmith_news
·
397d
The statement criticizes a media outlet for its editing choices, suggesting bias in the coverage of political candidates. It implies that the media did not provide equal opportunity for all candidates to express their views, which is a public issue related to media fairness and political representation.
- The statement does not use harmful language but criticizes the media's editing choices, which is a legitimate concern in public discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the media's actions rather than personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the need for fair representation of all candidates, encouraging viewers to consider the importance of equal media coverage. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the media's editing choices without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly critiquing media practices and advocating for fair representation. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.