Jill Stien

Rank 37 of 47
|
Score -80

The statement is a critique of the Biden/Harris administration's policies, particularly in relation to their impact on homelessness in the US and the situation in Gaza. It implies a misallocation of resources and criticizes their foreign policy decisions. The tone is accusatory and suggests a negative impact of their actions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement implies harm by accusing the administration of making Palestinians homeless, which could be seen as harmful rhetoric. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it does make a strong accusation against public figures.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is accusatory and lacks nuance. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to criticize government actions, which can be seen as an attempt to hold them accountable, but it does so in a potentially inflammatory way.
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but may not do so responsibly, as it makes serious accusations without providing evidence. [-1]