Jill Stien

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the political dynamics and voter behavior in the context of U.S. elections, specifically discussing the impact of third-party candidates like Jill Stein on the Democratic vote. It critiques the assumption that Stein's voters would naturally support a Democratic candidate if she were not in the race.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it could contribute to political polarization by framing the issue in a divisive manner.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does use a dismissive tone towards Democrats, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticizing a perceived misunderstanding without fostering dialogue. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it dismisses the opposing view without offering a reasoned argument or inviting discussion. [-1]
5. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement uses free speech to express a political opinion, but it could be more responsible by encouraging constructive dialogue rather than dismissing opposing views.